technical data Reducer Worm Reducer technical data
EWJ/EW/SW worm starting efficiency (reference value) (Double reduction: 1/100 to 1/3600)
| size | Reduction ratio | Start-up efficiency | size | Reduction ratio | Start-up efficiency | size | Reduction ratio | Start-up efficiency |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EWJ50 | 100 | 39.0% | EW80 SW80 |
100 | 41.6% | EW150 SW150 |
100 | 42.9% |
| 150 | 34.6% | 150 | 37.1% | 150 | 37.6% | |||
| 200 | 30.1% | 200 | 34.5% | 200 | 35.0% | |||
| 250 | 27.5% | 250 | 31.9% | 250 | 33.0% | |||
| 300 | 28.6% | 300 | 30.2% | 300 | 31.4% | |||
| 400 | 24.9% | 400 | 28.1% | 400 | 29.2% | |||
| 500 | 22.8% | 500 | 26.0% | 500 | 27.5% | |||
| 600 | 20.7% | 600 | 21.7% | 600 | 23.1% | |||
| 800 | 16.4% | 800 | 19.6% | 800 | 20.4% | |||
| 1000 | 14.8% | 1000 | 17.5% | 1000 | 18.7% | |||
| 1200 | 12.7% | 1200 | 15.9% | 1200 | 17.6% | |||
| 1500 | 12.9% | 1500 | 15.7% | 1500 | 16.5% | |||
| 1800 | 11.7% | 1800 | 13.1% | 1800 | 13.9% | |||
| 2400 | 9.3% | 2400 | 11.8% | 2400 | 12.2% | |||
| 3000 | 8.4% | 3000 | 10.6% | 3000 | 11.2% | |||
| 3600 | 7.2% | 3600 | 9.6% | 3600 | 10.6% | |||
| EWJ63 | 100 | 39.0% | EW100 SW100 |
100 | 42.2% | EW175 SW175 |
100 | 43.6% |
| 150 | 34.6% | 150 | 37.6% | 150 | 38.9% | |||
| 200 | 30.1% | 200 | 35.0% | 200 | 35.6% | |||
| 250 | 28.2% | 250 | 32.3% | 250 | 33.7% | |||
| 300 | 28.1% | 300 | 30.8% | 300 | 32.5% | |||
| 400 | 24.4% | 400 | 28.6% | 400 | 29.7% | |||
| 500 | 22.9% | 500 | 26.5% | 500 | 28.1% | |||
| 600 | 19.8% | 600 | 22.1% | 600 | 24.2% | |||
| 800 | 16.6% | 800 | 20.0% | 800 | 20.9% | |||
| 1000 | 17.2% | 1000 | 17.8% | 1000 | 19.3% | |||
| 1200 | 13.5% | 1200 | 16.2% | 1200 | 18.2% | |||
| 1500 | 13.6% | 1500 | 16.2% | 1500 | 16.8% | |||
| 1800 | 11.8% | 1800 | 13.5% | 1800 | 14.5% | |||
| 2400 | 9.9% | 2400 | 12.2% | 2400 | 12.5% | |||
| 3000 | 9.0% | 3000 | 10.9% | 3000 | 11.6% | |||
| 3600 | 8.1% | 3600 | 9.9% | 3600 | 10.9% | |||
| EWJ70 | 100 | 38.4% | EW125 SW125 |
100 | 42.2% | EW200 SW200 |
100 | 42.9% |
| 150 | 34.0% | 150 | 37.0% | 150 | 38.4% | |||
| 200 | 29.6% | 200 | 34.3% | 200 | 35.8% | |||
| 250 | 27.7% | 250 | 32.3% | 250 | 33.2% | |||
| 300 | 28.1% | 300 | 30.8% | 300 | 31.3% | |||
| 400 | 24.4% | 400 | 28.6% | 400 | 29.2% | |||
| 500 | 22.9% | 500 | 27.0% | 500 | 27.0% | |||
| 600 | 19.8% | 600 | 22.6% | 600 | 23.3% | |||
| 800 | 16.6% | 800 | 19.8% | 800 | 20.7% | |||
| 1000 | 17.2% | 1000 | 18.2% | 1000 | 18.6% | |||
| 1200 | 13.5% | 1200 | 17.1% | 1200 | 17.0% | |||
| 1500 | 13.2% | 1500 | 15.7% | 1500 | 15.3% | |||
| 1800 | 11.4% | 1800 | 13.1% | 1800 | 13.2% | |||
| 2400 | 9.6% | 2400 | 11.5% | 2400 | 11.7% | |||
| 3000 | 8.7% | 3000 | 10.6% | 3000 | 10.5% | |||
| 3600 | 7.8% | 3600 | 9.9% | 3600 | 9.6% |
Note) Starting efficiency is the efficiency when the rotation speed is 0 r/min. When starting the reducer, more power is required than when it is running. Use the above values as a reference.
Under normal circumstances, please use the continuous efficiency listed in the catalog. For the calculation method, please refer to "Efficiency Calculation."

